
maboreik@gmail.com
What is the proof of the existence of the Creator?
There are numerous proofs, yet we will present only two thereof:
- The proof of bringing into existence
- The proof of providence and perfection.
What does the proof of bringing into existence mean?
everything that came into being after it had been nonexistent must have an entity that caused it to exist and come into being.
In this way, we have unlimited number of proofs of the existence of the Creator, Exalted be He.
Every atom in the universe proves the creation since every created thing that came into being is in itself a proof of the Creator.
When you ponder over the existence, you find that it is temporal and liable to change; it is not permanent or eternal. Thus, it cannot be self sufficient. This should make you decisively believe in your mind that it has a creator; so, as soon as you look into the universe, your mind goes to the one who brought it into existence.
For that reason, there are numerous verses in the Quran that draw our attention to the universe and the things that exist around us. Allah Almighty said: {Say, آ“look at what is in the heavens and earth.آ” But the signs and warnings are of no avail to those who do not believe.} [Surat Yإ«nus: 101] Allah also said: {Do they not reflect on themselves? Allah did not create the heavens and earth and all that is between them except for a true purpose and for an appointed term, but most people deny the meeting with their Lord.} [Surat-ar-Rm: 8]
Allah also said: {Have they not observed the dominions of the heavens and earth and all that Allah has created} [Surah Al-A’rāf: 185]
Every created thing is a direct evidence on the creator.
What does the proof of providence and perfection mean?
Everything in the existence, starting from quarks – the smallest detected subatomic particle forming matter – up to galaxies, carries a degree of functional complexity.
In other words, it performs a specific and certain task.
Every functional complexity in nature is a status that exceeds mere existence.
To explain, existence is a degree, and the complexity in the existent thing is a degree that exceeds mere existence.
Everything around you is specifically designed to do a specific function.
This means that everything around you carries a functional complexity, which is an evidence of creation and bringing things into existence.
So, there must be an originator who brought them into existence.
Example of this is the electric lamp; it represents functional complexity, as it consists of:
1-Filament.
2-A lead wire that conducts the electricity to the filament.
3-Inert gas that protects the filament without interacting with it or with electricity.
4-Glass bulb that prevents the air to enter and the inert gas escaping the lamp or else the filament will burn.
5-Lamp base: it connects the lamp to the holder and forms a pathway for the electric current.
It is a system of complexity that cannot be simplified, and so it has an obvious intellectual connotation that denotes perfection of making.
The one who negates the existence of the perfect creation of the electric lamp or claims that it came to being by mere coincidence is the one who has to present the proof for this claim!
The maker of the lamp knows well what electricity is, its pathways, the benefits of the lamp and the sensitivity of the filament. Therefore, the existence of the lamp directly indicates that it has a proficient maker, and that it did not appear randomly, simply because there are other lamps that look completely different.
Using the same intellectual inference, we find that something that is functionally complex like a human being must have an originator that created him.
Whereas the electric lamp consists of five components, a human being consists of four billion components in every cell of his body.
Four billion components make up the functions of the organism, which are called: the genetic code, the genome, or DNA, and are located in the nucleus of each of your cells.
So, if you are to believe that the five components forming the electric lamp have a creator while you do not have a creator, then this would be problematic for yourself.
{Were they created by none, or were they the creators [of themselves]?} [Surah At-Tur: 35]
There is complexity in everything around you. There is nothing in nature; even in the atom, orbits, or in your own body, but it has some kind of functional complexity.
That functional complexity of every atom and particle exist in everything in the universe.
Allah Almighty said: {Indeed, in the creation of the heavens and earth; the alternation of the night and day; the sailing of the ships in the sea for the benefit of people; the sending down of rain from the sky by Allah, reviving thereby the earth after its death; the spreading of all kinds of creatures therein; the directing of the winds and clouds between the sky and earth in all these, there are signs for people of understanding.} [Surat al-Baqarah: 164] There are a lot of verses in this regard.
however, only those who apply their reason do take heed. {None will take heed except people of understanding.} [Surat al Imrān: 7]
When one employs his mind and looks into the existence (the evidence of bringing into existence) and contemplates the accuracy and functions of the created beings (evidence of providence and perfection) will certainly acknowledge the existence of the creator through reason.
2
Why could it not be that man and other organisms are generated from extremely simple and primitive one-celled beings?
There are two problems here:
The first problem
There is not a single piece of evidence that proves the transformation of one type of organism into another type, let alone such a shocking presumptive leap that man is originated from primitive one-celled beings.
So, how can an atheist believe in such an assumption which lacks any type of direct proof, and blame us for using religious intellectual inference?
Second problem
According to the Minimum Gene Set Concept, it is not possible for any organism, no matter how simple it is, to be below two hundred genes.
The minimum set of genes is the least number of genes by which an organism can live.
That is, if this minimum set misses only one gene, then the organism would not be able to live.
A gene is a tape of information that contains a large number of genetic codes that encrypt information.
There is a minimum number of genes that are essential for an organism to live: some genes are encrypted for energy – actually an organism cannot live without energy – while other genes are encrypted for nutrition, others for reproduction, others for the basic functions of life, and so on.
Scientists have calculated the minimum number of genes that are essential for life and decided that they cannot be less than two hundred.
Craig Venter Institute concluded that the minimum number of genes cannot be less than three hundred and eighty-two genes. 1 Scientists found out that Mycoplasma, which is the tiniest organism on earth, has 468 genes.
If the whole issue is about matter, and the world is just a physical system, then we need to start from the zero gene, if we want to go from
hydrogen to man!
However, science tells us that there is nothing called the zero gene, one gene, or even a hundred genes. Rather, science says: We need a gigantic set of information at minimum range, otherwise the living organism would not have appeared in the first place.
In nature, there is nothing primitive, but every system began with independent glamour!
The glamour in the information system, which encrypts the beings before they appear, will always remain a stumbling block in facing atheism, and for those who deny the divine creation!
You have four billion specialized pieces of information – the information within the nucleus of each one of your cells – to produce accurate biological functions.
The atheist used to spectulate that there were living beings that started from the zero gene, but the theory of minimal genes came and eliminated this fantasy.
In fact, organisms appeared functionally complex from the very first moment, otherwise, they would not have appeared in the first place.
